Menu

From 'Gotcha' to Growth

How principals promote learning in the context of teacher evaluation

By Learning Forward
Categories: Educator evaluation, Learning designs, School leadership
December 2014
Implementing teacher evaluation systems across the United States has created both challenges and opportunities to improving teacher quality. Lessons learned at the state level illustrate a wide range of challenges with system implementation, including value-added growth scores, implementation timetables, and human capital demands (McGuinn, 2012), but what are we learning about teacher evaluation at the school level? During a recent professional learning session, a group of K-12 teachers reflected on their interactions and experiences about campus principals and teacher evaluations. This question launched the conversation: “How is the principal promoting your professional growth using teacher evaluation?” From that came this exchange: A: It depends on the principal. Q: What do you mean? A: The principal either talks with teachers like evaluations are a “gotcha” or

Read the remaining content with membership access. Join or log in below to continue.

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem.

Log In
   

Authors

Janice Bradley

Janice Bradley (jbradley@nmsu.edu) is a research assistant professor at New Mexico State University.

Principal Strategies For Teacher Growth

  • Create a shared vision of classroom practices before school starts.
  • Protect professional learning community time.
  • Allocate funds for substitutes.
  • Support teachers who get an ineffective rating.

References

Easton, L.B. (Ed.). (2008). Powerful designs for professional learning (2nd ed.). Oxford, OH: NSDC.

City, E., Elmore, R., Fiarman, S., & Teitel, L. (2009). Instructional rounds in education: A network approach to improving teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Fullan, M. (2014). The principal: Three keys to maximizing impact. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Hord, S.H. (2009, Winter). Professional learning communities: Educators work together for a shared purpose. JSD, 30(1), 40-43.

Learning Forward (2011). Standards for Professional Learning. Oxford, OH: Author.

McGuinn, P. (2012). The state of teacher evaluation reform: State education agency and the implementation of new teacher-evaluation systems. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.


+ posts

Learning Forward is the only professional association devoted exclusively to those who work in educator professional development. We help our members plan, implement, and measure high-quality professional learning so they can achieve success with their systems, schools, and students.


Categories: Educator evaluation, Learning designs, School leadership

Search
The Learning Professional


Published Date

CURRENT ISSUE



  • Recent Issues

    EVALUATING PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
    February 2024

    How do you know your professional learning is working? This issue digs...

    TAKING THE NEXT STEP
    December 2023

    Professional learning can open up new roles and challenges and help...

    REACHING ALL LEARNERS
    October 2023

    Both special education and general education teachers need support to help...

    THE TIME DILEMMA
    August 2023

    Prioritizing professional learning time is an investment in educators and...

    Skip to content