Learning Forward
Equity and excellence in teaching and learning.
FOCUS
One vision, many paths
Personalized learning blends teacher interests with a collective purpose
By Paul Emerich France
Categories: Implementation, Learning designs, PersonalizationAugust 2019
Vol. 40 No. 4
Educators deserve professional learning tailored to their needs, but far too many models for personalization are built on a faulty foundation of myths. Those myths include the assumption that personalization necessitates large investments in technology and the erroneous belief that it must look different for every educator. These myths make the workload of personalization unsustainable and create divides between teachers instead of the collaboration educators really need. It is important to challenge these myths and develop approaches that honor both the individual and collective. When we do so, we become liberated by balance and have the opportunity to make professional learning meaningful and relevant. Personalization Myths People often confuse personalization with individualization. They assume that the more distinct and separate learning is for each individual,
Read the remaining content with membership access. Join or log in below to continue.
Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem.
References
Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching (2nd ed.). Richmond, VA: ASCD.
DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2010). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional communities at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Durkheim, E. (1893). The division of labour in society. New York, NY: Free Press.
Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (2011). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia experience in transformation (3rd ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
France, P. (2019). Reclaiming personalized learning: A pedagogy for restoring equity and humanity to our schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE/Corwin Press.
Hattie, J. (2016, July 11). Mindframes and maximizers. Visible Learning Annual Conference, Washington, DC.
Pink, D. (2011). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
Responsive Classroom. (2015). The first six weeks of school (2nd ed.). Turner Falls, MA: Center for Responsive Schools.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Categories: Implementation, Learning designs, Personalization
CURRENT ISSUE
Recent Issues
LEARNING WITH AI
February 2026
Generative AI can be a powerful tool for professional learning design and...
WHAT STUDENTS NEED NOW
December 2025
For all students to thrive, we need to understand who they are and what...
LEARNING COMMUNITIES FOR LEADERS
October 2025
Leaders need opportunities to connect, learn, and grow with peers just as...
MAXIMIZING RESOURCES
August 2025
This issue offers advice about making the most of professional learning...
