Menu

Make The Case For Coaching

Bolster support with evidence that coaching makes a difference

By Learning Forward
October 2013
It is not difficult to persuade school leaders and teachers that instructional coaching represents an important alternative to traditional teacher professional learning. Many recognize that job-embedded professional learning in the form of instructional coaching, aligned to a clear set of research-based practices, is nonevaluative, and, if provided with regularity, can help teachers become better at their craft. Real-time, side-by-side support is infinitely more effective than drop-in or drive-by professional learning that offers no opportunity for collaboration and collective problem solving. There may be general agreement on this point, but that is not enough. In fact, a very important constituency — policymakers — has not been especially enthusiastic about the promise of coaching. Why is that? Policymakers want to see evidence that coaching makes a difference

Read the remaining content with membership access. Join or log in below to continue.

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem.

Log In
   

Authors

Ellen Eisenberg and Elliott Medrich

Ellen Eisenberg (eeisenberg@pacoaching.org) is executive director and Elliott Medrich (elliottmedrich@gmail.com) is a senior advisor and evaluator at the Pennsylvania Institute for Instructional Coaching.

Guidelines for Gathering Evidence

1.Don’t forget to evaluate.

Seems simple, but that’s not always the case. With limited funds, program managers often treat evaluation as an afterthought — something to worry about after the hard work associated with design and implementation has been addressed. Evaluation, however, needs to live near the top of the list of things about which to worry. It is every bit as important as any other aspect of an instructional coaching initiative. Evaluation also matters in a more general sense in that others seeking to replicate an instructional coaching framework need evidence that it works, or else it will be difficult for them to gain the support of policymakers and practitioners.

2. If the evidentiary base around your area of work is thin or nonexistent, worry about how this will affect your funding prospects.

Why doesn’t every school district jump at the chance to fund coaching? Because it’s an investment — school districts are funding coaches instead of doing something else — those who must allocate scarce resources want to know that they are making a wise decision. If there isn’t much in the way of evidence, it’s hard to argue the case persuasively.

3. If you expect that all the evidence will show amazing, awesome results, you haven’t been paying attention to education evaluation literature.

Smart policymakers know that outcomes are not all great and not always consistent. They know that even programs that work well in some circumstances may not work well in other settings or in the hands of other personnel. The trick is to have enough evidence available so that program managers can understand, as best as they can, which circumstances hold the best promise for success. In our work at the Pennsylvania Institute for Instructional Coaching, we recognize that certain kinds of supports are essential to a successful instructional coaching initiative. We do our best to help districts and schools create conditions that may lead to success. We use evaluations to help make these data-driven decisions.

4. Rigor matters.

If you are bothering to do evaluation research, do it well. Be clear about what you are trying to measure. Be clear on what metrics matter. Craft good instrumentation. Undertake robust and appropriate analyses. Report results completely, not just the good bits. Tell the story, and be honest about what has been learned.

5. Let evaluation drive continuous improvement.

Evaluation is not scary. It should be your best friend. It should help you think and rethink what you are doing and recalibrate your work to improve the prospects of meeting your objectives. If you are afraid to critically evaluate what you are doing and how you are doing it, you are out of step with current funding philosophy. In the case of instructional coaching, we need to continue to build the evaluation portfolio so that others can learn how it can fit into the larger picture of professional learning and understand how to use instructional coaching to meet teacher and student needs.


+ posts

Learning Forward is the only professional association devoted exclusively to those who work in educator professional development. We help our members plan, implement, and measure high-quality professional learning so they can achieve success with their systems, schools, and students.


Search
The Learning Professional


Published Date

CURRENT ISSUE



  • Recent Issues

    EVALUATING PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
    February 2024

    How do you know your professional learning is working? This issue digs...

    TAKING THE NEXT STEP
    December 2023

    Professional learning can open up new roles and challenges and help...

    REACHING ALL LEARNERS
    October 2023

    Both special education and general education teachers need support to help...

    THE TIME DILEMMA
    August 2023

    Prioritizing professional learning time is an investment in educators and...

    Skip to content