Learning Forward
Equity and excellence in teaching and learning.
FOCUS
All together now
Internal coherence framework supports instructional leadership teams
By Elizabeth Leisy Stosich, Michelle L. Forman and Candice Bocala
June 2019
Vol. 40, No. 3
More than a decade of research suggests that improving the quality of instruction and student learning requires leaders to set a vision for instruction, promote teacher learning around that vision, and foster organizational conditions for teacher collaboration and growth (Louis, Dretzke, & Wahlstrom, 2010). Yet designing professional learning that enhances instructional leadership has proven challenging. Previous attempts may have been unsuccessful because they targeted only school principals rather than teams of leaders or because they were conducted away from school sites rather than being job-embedded. Increasing school leaders’ knowledge of curriculum, instruction, and assessment is insufficient. Improving instructional leadership requires increasing school leaders’ direct involvement with teachers in these core areas. A team-based approach to professional learning is more effective in enhancing the instructional leadership
Read the remaining content with membership access. Join or log in below to continue.
Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem.
GET THE SURVEY
Download the Internal Coherence Survey at ic.serpmedia.org/assets/internal_coherence_survey_october2016.pdf.
References
Cohen, D.K. & Ball, D.L. (1999). Instruction, capacity, and improvement (CPRE Research Report Series RR-43).
Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Elmore, R.F., Forman, M.L., & Stosich, E.L. (2016). The Internal Coherence Survey. Washington, DC: SERP Institute. Available at ic.serpmedia.org/assets/internal_coherence_survey_october2016.pdf.
Forman, M.L., Stosich, E.L., & Bocala, C. (2017). The Internal Coherence Framework: Creating the conditions for continuous improvement in schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Goddard, R.D., Hoy, W.K., & Hoy, A.W. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 3-13.
Ingersoll, R., Sirinides, P., & Dougherty, P. (2017). School leadership, teachers’ roles in school decisionmaking, and student achievement. Working Paper (#WP 2017-2). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
Louis, K.S., Dretzke, B., & Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(3), 315-336.
Candice Bocala (candice_bocala@gse.harvard.edu) is a lecturer at Harvard Graduate School of Education.
CURRENT ISSUE
Subscribe
Recent Issues
LEARNING TO PIVOT
August 2024
Sometimes new information and situations call for major change. This issue...
GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES
June 2024
What does professional learning look like around the world? This issue...
WHERE TECHNOLOGY CAN TAKE US
April 2024
Technology is both a topic and a tool for professional learning. This...
EVALUATING PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
February 2024
How do you know your professional learning is working? This issue digs...
