Menu

Pave The Way For Coaches

Principal's actions are key to shaping roles and relationships

By Learning Forward
June 2013
Instructional coaching can make the difference in whether teachers implement best practices (Coburn & Woulfin, 2012). However, our experiences in various coaching and administrative roles as well as our research with literary coaches has shown that the relationship with and support of the administration, especially the building principal, is essential for coaches to be successful in their leadership role. Developing trusting relationships and credibility with teachers in a new school can be a daunting challenge for instructional coaches. One coach spoke candidly about the icy environment that greeted her: “The first year, I was treated like I worked for the IRS.” This reading coach stayed the course and focused her efforts with teachers who were most receptive, the 1st-grade team. Within one year, test scores

Read the remaining content with membership access. Join or log in below to continue.

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem.

Log In
   

Authors

Sally F. Heineke and Barbara Polnick

Sally F. Heineke (sfh006@shsu.edu) is an assistant professor in the Department of Language, Literacy, and Special Populations, and Barbara Polnick (elc_bep@shsu.edu) is an associate professor in the Department of Educational Leadership and Counseling at Sam Houston State University in Huntsville, Texas.

5 ways to support coaches

For principals who want to see sustained student growth through improved teaching, we offer these five recommendations for supporting and maximizing the role of an instructional coach.

  1. Define the coach’s role.
  2. Publicize the coach’s role.
  3. Guard the coach’s role — the coach is not an evaluator.
  4. Facilitate collaboration.
  5. Hire prepared instructional coaches.

References

Biancarosa, G., Bryk, A., & Dexter, E. (2010). Assessing the value-added effects of Literacy Collaborative professional development on student learning. Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 7-34.

 

Burkins, J.M. (2007). Coaching for balance: How to meet the challenges of literacy coaching. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

 

Coburn, C.E. & Woulfin, S.L. (2012). Reading coaches and the relationship between policy and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 5-30.

 

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy and evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1).

 

Dozier, C. (2006). Responsive literacy coaching: Tools for creating and sustaining purposeful change. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.

 

Heineke, S.F. (2010). Reading coaching discourse: Practical applications. In J. Cassidy, S. Garrett, & M. Sailors (Eds.), Literacy Coaching: Research and Practice. Corpus Christi, TX: Consortium for Educational Development, Evaluation, and Research, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi.

 

International Reading Association. (2010). Standards 2010: Reading specialist/literacy coach. Newark, DE: Author.

 

Learning Forward. (2011). Standards for Professional Learning. Oxford, OH: Author.

 

Richard, A. (2003). Making our own road: The emergence of school-based staff developers in America’s public schools. New York, NY: The Edna McConnell Clark Foundation.

 

Sailors, M. & Price, L.R. (2010). Professional development that supports the teaching of cognitive reading strategy instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 110(3), 301-322.

 

Smith, A.T. (2007). The middle school literacy coach: Considering roles in context. In D.W. Rowe, R.T. Jimenez, D.L. Compton, D.K. Dickinson, Y. Kim, K.M. Leander, V.J. Risko (Eds.), 56th yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.

 

Steckel, B. (2009). Fulfilling the promise of literacy coaches in urban schools: What does it take to make an impact? The Reading Teacher, 63(1), 14-23.

 

Tivnan, T. & Hamphill, L. (2005). Comparing four literacy reform models in high-poverty schools: Patterns of first-grade achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 105(5), 419-441.

Walpole, S., McKenna, M.C., Uribe-Zarain, X., & Lamitina, D. (2010). The relationships between coaching and instruction in the primary grades: Evidence from high-poverty schools. The Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 115-140.


+ posts

Learning Forward is the only professional association devoted exclusively to those who work in educator professional development. We help our members plan, implement, and measure high-quality professional learning so they can achieve success with their systems, schools, and students.


Search
The Learning Professional


Published Date

CURRENT ISSUE



  • Recent Issues

    EVALUATING PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
    February 2024

    How do you know your professional learning is working? This issue digs...

    TAKING THE NEXT STEP
    December 2023

    Professional learning can open up new roles and challenges and help...

    REACHING ALL LEARNERS
    October 2023

    Both special education and general education teachers need support to help...

    THE TIME DILEMMA
    August 2023

    Prioritizing professional learning time is an investment in educators and...

    Skip to content