• Subscribe

    Sign up here for our monthly newsletter.

  • Menu

    FOCUS

    Teacher leaders make change ideas stick

    By Sara DeMartino, Glenn Nolly and Anthony Petrosky
    Categories: Improvement science/networks, Mentoring & induction, Teacher leadership
    April 2023
    Learning to use improvement science — a structured process for planning, implementing, and studying change efforts — takes time. That time is a worthwhile investment for schools aiming to shift teaching and learning, but it can be a barrier in schools that are often beset by leadership turnover. How can schools, and external partners like us, address that challenge and help improvement science efforts achieve their potential? In our work supporting improvement in secondary school literacy practices, we at the Institute for Learning have discovered the power of teacher leadership to institutionalize knowledge, spread innovation, and maintain the momentum of improvement science efforts. When veteran teachers offer coaching, feedback, and follow-up to other teachers in their schools, they can help improvement practices stick (Hill &

    Read the remaining content with membership access. Join or log in below to continue.

    Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem.

    Log In
       

    References

    Brown, A. (2020). Curanderismo. In Sana Sana. Game Over Books.

    Davis, D.S. & Vehabovic, N. (2017). The dangers of test preparation: What students learn (and don’t learn) about reading comprehension from test‐centric literacy instruction. The Reading Teacher, 71(5), 579-588.

    Hill, H.C. & Papay, J.P. (2022). Building better PL: How to strengthen teacher learning. Research Partnership for Professional Learning.

    McConachie, S.M. & Petrosky, A.R. (2009). Content matters: A disciplinary literacy approach to improving student learning. John Wiley & Sons.

    Odell, S.J. & Ferraro, D.P. (1992). Teacher mentoring and teacher retention. Journal of Teacher education, 43(3), 200-204.

    TEA. (2019). Texas Education Agency 2018-19 school report card W H ADAMSON H S (057905002). Author. mydata.dallasisd.org/docs/SRC/1819/SRC/201819_SRC_2.pdf

    Wang, J. & Odell, S.J. (2002). Mentored learning to teach according to standards-based reform: A critical review. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 481-546.


    Sara demartino
    + posts

    Sara DeMartino (smd94@pitt.edu) is an English language arts fellow at the Institute for Learning, University of Pittsburgh.

    + posts

    Glenn Nolly (gln4@pitt.edu) is a leadership fellow at the Institute for Learning, University of Pittsburgh.

    Anthony petrosky
    + posts

    Anthony Petrosky (tpetrosk@pitt.edu) is director of the Institute for Learning and holds a joint appointment as a professor in the School of Education and the English department at the University of Pittsburgh.


    Categories: Improvement science/networks, Mentoring & induction, Teacher leadership

    Search
    The Learning Professional


    Published Date

    CURRENT ISSUE



  • Subscribe

  • Recent Issues

    NAVIGATING NEW ROLES
    April 2025

    Whether you’re new to your role or supporting others who are new,...

    LEARNING DESIGNS
    February 2025

    How we learn influences what we learn. This issue shares essential...

    BUILDING BRIDGES
    December 2024

    Students benefit when educators bridge the continuum of professional...

    CURRICULUM-BASED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
    October 2024

    High-quality curriculum requires skilled educators to put it into...