Menu

The long and winding road to social justice

Missouri district uses culturally responsive instruction to close the achievement gap

By Charlotte Ijei
Categories: Change management, Reaching all students
August 2010
In working toward social justice in schools, we encounter people at different places on the continuum. Educators in our large, primarily white, suburban school district — Parkway School District in St. Louis, Mo. — range from the resistant to the eager reformer. Our challenge over the last year has been to address the data and move our staff to a place where we can say that we will reach and teach all children. A key component to eliminating the achievement gap is building relationships between educators and students of color. The majority of teachers in the district are white, and they are responsible for teaching all students. If African-American students do not believe that teachers care about them, they are less likely to work for their teachers. Therefore, we help white teachers understand how to build relationships with African-American students

Read the remaining content with membership access. Join or log in below to continue.

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem.

Log In
   

Authors

Charlotte Ijei and Julie Harrison

Charlotte Ijei (cijei@pkwy.k12.mo.us) is director of pupil personnel and diversity, and Julie Harrison (Jharrison@pkwy.k12.mo.us) is coordinator of guidance and counseling at the Parkway Instructional Services Center in the Parkway School District, St. Louis, Mo.

Phases of Curricular Revision With Regard to Race

  1. White history: The world is centered on my experience, and I tell the stories.
  2. White history with examples of outstanding achievement by persons of color: I tell the stories, but I may include you.
  3. People of color as a problem, anomaly, or absence in history: My narratives center on the ways you have challenged my authority or dominance.
  4. People of color as history: I listen as you tell your version of the stories.
  5. History redefined or reconstructed to include us all: The stories are only complete when we all have spoken.

Source: McIntosh, 1990.

If this student had not been in a fight, he would have become a statistic

As an African-American administrator in the district, I am often reminded that I am different from the majority. As an adult, my life experiences have helped me to navigate through difficult times. However, I often think about the students of color who could be experiencing some of the same issues I have faced, but without the life experiences to help them deal with these challenges. That reminder helps me stay focused on our goals as a district: To raise all children up so that they feel a sense of belonging to their school and their education, and so that they are able to reach their full potential as learners and citizens of a multicultural and diverse world.

One story highlights my learning journey. We realized that Parkway’s academic data weren’t the only alarming indicators that we were failing students. Student discipline data also highlighted stark disparities. Although African-Americans made up only 16% of the student population, their suspension rate was higher than any other student group. We said we were meeting the needs of all students, but the truth was in the data.

Students who are suspended must attend a hearing with the Discipline Review Committee. There was one African-American male on this committee and, when I joined, I noticed that he stayed silent for fear of losing his job. I also noticed the difference between the lengths of time out of school that African-American students received compared to their white counterparts. The language used to describe the incidents was more inflammatory for African-Americans than whites. I began addressing other red flags I saw in the discipline packet prepared by administrators. The packet contained information such as the student’s grades, test scores, attendance, and the record of interventions.

One student’s visit to the District Review Committee is unforgettable and clearly indicated to me that underperforming African-American students flew under the radar unless they had discipline issues. A student entered the room and quietly said how sorry he was for fighting. He was facing suspension or expulsion, but the administrator explained to the committee before the family came in that this student was a great young man and had a clean discipline history.

As I looked through the student’s file, I began to see a bigger problem. This 11th grader had only earned nine credits toward graduation. At that point, he should have earned at least 17.5 credits. I also saw that this student had been struggling in reading since elementary school. I asked: “Has this student been helped by our care team? Have you seen this student’s standardized test scores? What interventions have been put in place to help this student succeed?” I was more interested in our culpability for the lack of support that led him to a violent expression of his frustration than for the responsibility we were asking him to take for his failure to make adequate academic progress. I realized that if this student had NOT gotten into a fight, he would have become another statistic. This incident turned out to be a good thing because it forced the system to work for him instead of against him. He began receiving the services he needed to recover credits and improve his chances to graduate with his classmates.

After this and other incidents, I took a look at the bigger picture. As I expected, this student’s case was more the rule than the exception. We needed to look at our culturally unresponsive climate and find a way to train as many administrators and teachers in social justice in the shortest amount of time as possible. We did not have time to waste — students’ futures were at risk.

— Charlotte Ijei

The Crede Standards for Sffective Pedagogy and Learning

  1. Joint productive activity: Teacher and students producing together.
  2. Language development: Developing language and literacy across the curriculum.
  3. Contextualization: Making meaning: Connecting school to students’ lives.
  4. Challenging activities: Teaching complex thinking.
  5. Instructional conversation: Teaching through conversation.

Source: CREDE, n.d.

References

Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence. (n.d.). The CREDE five standards for effective pedagogy and learning. Available at https://crede.berkeley. edu/research/crede/standards.html.

 

McIntosh, P. (1990). Interactive phases of curricular and personal re-vision with regard to race. In C.L. Nelson & K.A. Wilson (Eds.), Seeding the process of multicultural education: An anthology (pp. 166-188). Plymouth, MN: Minnesota Inclusiveness Program.


+ posts

Categories: Change management, Reaching all students

Search
The Learning Professional


Published Date

CURRENT ISSUE


Recent Issues

LEARNING WITH AI
February 2026

Generative AI can be a powerful tool for professional learning design and...

WHAT STUDENTS NEED NOW
December 2025

For all students to thrive, we need to understand who they are and what...

LEARNING COMMUNITIES FOR LEADERS
October 2025

Leaders need opportunities to connect, learn, and grow with peers just as...

MAXIMIZING RESOURCES
August 2025

This issue offers advice about making the most of professional learning...

×

Register your interest

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.