Skip to content
  • Subscribe

    Sign up here for our monthly newsletter.

  • Menu

    FOCUS

    In professional learning, form should follow function

    By Thomas R. Guskey
    Categories: Learning designs, Outcomes
    February 2025
    In 1896, renowned architect Louis Sullivan coined the phrase “form follows function,” which became the guiding principle in 20th-century architecture. Sullivan meant the purpose of a building should be the starting point for its design. The same is true in designing professional learning. To achieve the goal of improving results for all students, we must make student success the starting point in planning all professional learning experiences and activities. Design issues related to how best to engage educators in professional learning and develop their buy-in, how to build on their existing knowledge, how to address issues of equity, and how to integrate expectations for collaboration are all important. But before we consider these crucial “how” questions, we must first address the more important question of

    Read the remaining content with membership access. Join or log in below to continue.

    Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem.

    Log In
       

    References

    Boylan, M., Coldwell, M., Maxwell, B., & Jordan, J. (2017). Rethinking models of professional learning as tools: A conceptual analysis to inform research and practice. Professional Development in Education, 44(1), 120-139.

    Cetin, C. & Bayrakci, M. (2019). Teacher professional development models for effective teaching and learning in schools. The Online Journal of Quality in Higher Education, 6(1), 32-38.

    Covey, S.R. (2004). The 7 habits of highly effective people. Free Press.

    Guskey, T.R. (2017). Where do you want to get to? Evaluating the effectiveness of professional learning experiences. The Learning Professional, 38(2), 32-37.

    Guskey, T.R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Corwin Press.

    Guskey, T.R. (2024). Look beyond the satisfaction survey: A framework to evaluate results of professional learning. The Learning Professional, 45(1), 28-33.

    Guskey, T.R., Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2024). The unwinnable battle over minimum grades. Educational Leadership, 82(2), 68-72.

    Guskey, T.R., Roy, P., & von Frank, V. (2014). Reaching the highest standard in professional learning: Data. Corwin Press.

    Joyce, B. & Calhoun, E. (2010). Models of professional development: A celebration of educators. Corwin Press.

    Kraft, M.A. & Papay, J.P. (2014). Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development? Explaining heterogeneity in returns to teaching experience. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 476-500.

    Learning Forward. (2022). Standards for Professional Learning

    Martin, L.E., Kragler, S., Quatroche, D.J., & Bauserman, K.L (Eds.) (2015). Handbook of professional development in education: Successful models and practices, preK-12. Guilford Press.

    Payne, C.M. (2008). So much reform, so little change: The persistence of failure in urban schools. Harvard Education Press.

    Ravhuhali, F., Mashau, T., Kutame, P., & Mutshaeni, H.N. (2015). Teachers’ professional development models for effective teaching and learning in schools: What works best for teachers? International Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(1), 57-68.

    Schmoker, M. (2019). Focusing on the essentials. Educational Leadership, 77(1), 30-35.

    SERC. (2024). Models of professional development. ctserc.org/news/2013-2000/models-of-professional-development

    Taylor, J.A., Getty, S.R., Kowalski, S.M., Wilson, C.D., Carlson, J., & Van Scotter, P. (2015). An efficacy trial of research-based curriculum materials with curriculum-based professional development. American Educational Research Journal, 52(5), 984-1017.


    Thomas guskey photo02
    University of Kentucky | + posts

    Thomas R. Guskey, PhD, is Professor Emeritus in the College of Education, University of Kentucky. He is a longtime member of Learning Forward, best known for his work on teacher change and on planning, implementing, and evaluating effective professional learning. Contact him by email at guskey@uky.edu, on X at @tguskey, or at www.tguskey.com.


    Categories: Learning designs, Outcomes

    Search
    The Learning Professional


    Published Date

    CURRENT ISSUE



  • Subscribe

  • Recent Issues

    BUILDING BRIDGES
    December 2024

    Students benefit when educators bridge the continuum of professional...

    CURRICULUM-BASED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
    October 2024

    High-quality curriculum requires skilled educators to put it into...

    LEARNING TO PIVOT
    August 2024

    Sometimes new information and situations call for major change. This issue...

    GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES
    June 2024

    What does professional learning look like around the world? This issue...