A Tapestry Of Inquiry And Action

Cycle of learning weaves its way through washington district

Vol. 33 No. 3

Imagine a system of learning such as this, where learning for everyone is pervasive, where adults routinely let go of their expertise in ways that enable authentic exploration of new ideas and new practices, and where they expect to take risks. Imagine a system that publicly references their “problems of practice,” transparently communicating that growth for students demands change and reciprocal accountability throughout the system. And imagine a system so aligned that problems of practice exist at every level, connected in a nested system with visible interdependence. Welcome to the West Valley School District in eastern Washington. Home to almost 4,000 students, West Valley made a public commitment more than seven years ago that all students would graduate with the option to attend college. This

Read the remaining content with membership access. Join or log in below to continue.

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem.

Authors

Harriette Thurber Rasmussen and Kathryn Karschney

Harriette Thurber Rasmussen (harriette@abeosco.org) and Kathryn Karschney (katy@abeosc.org) are partners and coaches at Abeo School Change in Seattle, Wash., and the Washington State Leadership Academy.

As an outsider, you would not guess there was any hierarchy in the room. Glancing down at highlighted and annotated text, the 11 leaders listen, elaborate, advocate, and reflect on the implications of the study they had just read on central office transformation. What do they recognize about themselves in the research? How does this inform their problem of practice? What does this mean for their own practices as leaders? The learning stance at the table belies any suggestion that this is not a level playing field, yet it is, in fact, a multilevel team of building and district leaders, instructional coaches, and the superintendent. The team’s coach sits back and watches the exchange with a satisfied smile on her face. She sees what she’s been working toward. They own this work; it is theirs.

a-tapestry-of-inquiry-and-action

What does a principal’s leadership problem of practice look like?

Example 1:

How do I develop and model a building-wide practice where student and staff work is evaluated for learning?

One guiding principle for me is leading with equity in mind. Do we teach using equitable practices? Do we have an equitable structure and schedule in place?

I want to use student and teacher work to measure my success.

I also want to use student focus groups as a measurement.

Example 2:

How do I use data more systematically across grade levels, teams, and staffs across the district while meeting the needs of Title I, Learning Assistance Program, and Response to Intervention?

I want to help teachers understand that standards need to be posted and public. One of the biggest challenges for struggling learners is knowing what they are supposed to know and be able to do.

I will measure my success by asking special education students: “What are you doing and why?” If they can explain well, then standards are clearly present and taught.

Example 3:

How can I keep staff focused on instructional strategies?

I will continue to begin and end every collaborative session with my elevator speech, which allows me to continually send the message what we are doing and why.

I will bring teams together to share and pull them into a shared conversation.

I will measure my success with one-on-one interviews about my question above.

What Isn’t Cooperative Group Work

In working with differentiation, Karschney suggests that cooperative group work is not:

Having students sit side by side at the same table doing individual assignments;

Assigning a report to a group where one student does all the work and the rest put their names on it;

Simply discussing ideas, helping each other, or sharing materials — although these are important activities that can be part of cooperative learning.

a-tapestry-of-inquiry-and-action-1

References

Copland, M. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 375-396.

Learning Forward

+ posts

Learning Forward is the only professional association devoted exclusively to those who work in educator professional development. We help our members plan, implement, and measure high-quality professional learning so they can achieve success with their systems, schools, and students.

Search
The Learning Professional

Published Date

Reset

CURRENT ISSUE

Recent Issues

LEARNING TO PIVOT

August 2024

Sometimes new information and situations call for major change. This issue...

GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES

June 2024

What does professional learning look like around the world? This issue...

WHERE TECHNOLOGY CAN TAKE US

April 2024

Technology is both a topic and a tool for professional learning. This...

EVALUATING PROFESSIONAL LEARNING

February 2024

How do you know your professional learning is working? This issue digs...

Curriculum-based professional learning

October 2024