Read the remaining content with membership access. Join or log in below to continue.
Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem.
Academy for Educational Development. (2002). National Writing Project: Final evaluation report. New York: Author.
Biancarosa, G. & Snow, C.E. (2004). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy. A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
Dickey, K., Hirabayashi, J., Murray, A., St. John, M., & Stokes, L., with Senauke, L. (2005, December). The National Writing Project client satisfaction and program impact: Results from a satisfaction survey and follow-up survey of participants at 2004 invitational institutes.
Gray, J. (2000). Teachers at the center: A memoir of the early years of the National Writing Project. Berkeley, CA: National Writing Project.
Lieberman, A. & Wood, D. (2003). Inside the National Writing Project: Connecting network learning and classroom teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
National Commission on Writing for America’s Families, Schools, and Colleges. (2003). The neglected “r”: The need for a writing revolution. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
National Commission on Writing for America’s Families, Schools, and Colleges. (in press). Writing and school reform. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
National Writing Project. (2003). Annual report 2003. Berkeley, CA: Author.
National Writing Project. (2005, February). Local site research initiative report — Cohort I (2003–2004). Berkeley, CA: Author.
National Writing Project. (2006, February). Local site research initiative report — Cohort II (2004–2005). Berkeley, CA: Author.
National Writing Project & Nagin, C. (2006). Because writing matters: Improving student writing in our schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Smith, M. (1993). Introduction: Portfolio classrooms. In M. Smith & M. Ylvisaker (Eds.). Teachers’ voices: Portfolios in the classroom (pp. 1–9). Berkeley, CA: National Writing Project.
Tompkins, G. (2004). Teaching writing: Balancing process and product (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Learning Forward is the only professional association devoted exclusively to those who work in educator professional development. We help our members plan, implement, and measure high-quality professional learning so they can achieve success with their systems, schools, and students.
What does professional learning look like around the world? This issue...
Technology is both a topic and a tool for professional learning. This...
How do you know your professional learning is working? This issue digs...
Professional learning can open up new roles and challenges and help...