As participants in the Redesign PD Community of Practice, the Bridgeport Public Schools in Connecticut and the Loudon County and Shelby County school districts in Tennessee have developed rubrics to better ensure that the professional learning being provided throughout their districts meets standards of high quality. Read more about how each district is making progress using these tools.

For more than a century, teachers in the Loudon County (Tenn.) School District have come together before the start of the school year for a professional development (PD) day. But not anymore.

For the first time this year, professional learning in the district will be based at each individual school—a result of the district’s use of a new rubric, which states that professional learning should relate to the goals of learning communities, be supported by an administrator, and be useful to teachers in their classrooms. Principals were introduced to the rubric during an administrator academy over the summer.

“I didn’t feel like I could stand in front of principals and tell them to run [PD] through the rubric when I hadn’t done it,” says Mike Garren, the district’s assistant director of schools.

Maria Warren, the district’s supervisor for elementary education and response to intervention, adds that now when principals receive proposals for professional development, they can look at how the presentation or contents line up against the rubric.

Ensuring the quality of professional learning

When many departments offer professional learning in a district and even at each individual school, it can be tough to ensure that the learning is high quality. But that’s what the teams from the Loudon County and Shelby County school districts in Tennessee, and the Bridgeport Public Schools are working toward with new rubrics. As part of the Redesign PD community, all three systems chose to work on building a system of professional development that is coherent and relevant to teachers, meaning that the learning is useful, timely, and related to their practice in the classroom.

“We are building a process to really have the district improvement plan drive the focus of the work and ultimately develop a few key priorities for schools to work on,” says Terry Carroll, the assistant superintendent of instruction for Bridgeport schools.

Creating a rubric, she adds, is a way for those providing professional development to better articulate how the professional learning is addressing specific needs. The Bridgeport team started with first developing a Professional Learning Planning Guide—a detailed set of questions to be asked about any professional learning offered. The questions, for example, include:

  • Does your professional learning plan include strategies that support discourse and sharing among participants?
  • Does your professional learning plan scaffold sessions to build on prior knowledge?
  • Does your professional learning plan offer varied structures such as small group, classroom embedded, tech supported?

The guide has been introduced to different committees and focus groups and was used during table talk exercises with administrators. “We’ll have fully vetted criteria by September,” Carroll says. “The feedback has been positive.” Schools have also been charged with developing professional learning advisory committees that will have the criteria to guide their work.

In gathering input from various audiences on the guide, Carroll says the Cycle of Inquiry used by Redesign PD Community of Practice districts has kept her team on track.

Learning that helps teachers make progress

In the Shelby County district, professional learning is considered a key component of reaching goals that the district has identified as Destination 2025. Teachers “want to be a key lever in achieving those goals,” says Kori Hamner, the director of support and professional development. But she adds that because the people on her team can’t facilitate all of the professional learning across the district, they needed a way to make sure that what was being offered was meeting certain expectations.

“It has to really help teachers make the progress that we need to see in our students,” she says.

Her team has created design principles to guide professional learning and drafted a presentation rubric in order to gather feedback in response to those principles. All sessions are also now expected to have “kudos”—which stands for what teachers are supposed to know, understand, and do after they participate in the learning. So far, the principles and the expectations have primarily been applied to the sessions offered as part of the three district learning days held during the year.

The Loudon County team began the process of developing their rubric by surveying teachers in a focus group about their professional learning experiences. The teachers represented a variety of content areas and levels in order to provide good data. Warren says they knew if teachers gave good marks on the survey, then they were experiencing high-quality learning.

Principals will also be able to use the overall template that has now been created and adapt it for professional learning at their local schools. Warren adds that the rubric has already been helpful in guiding professional learning related to RTI. After seeking input from a broad array of educators—including school psychologists, special education teachers, general education teachers, and other players—Warren says her team was able to streamline professional learning to make it better meet their needs. “We were trying to put a Band-Aid on certain things, and not covering things in depth,” Warren says. She adds that the process “helped us to listen to what the teachers were really looking for.”

Ongoing challenges

Even with the criteria, Carroll says getting Bridgeport’s some 40 schools to each focus on priority areas for professional learning, in the midst of other demands, will still be a challenge. But she adds that she’s encouraged by the reaction from the staff developers across the district. “They appreciated seeing the bigger picture and how it’s all connected,” she says.

In Loudon County, Garren says he expects to face typical challenges in getting principals to use the rubric. “There are some principals who will see our vision and others who think there is another hoop to jump through,” he says, but adds that he is trying to lead by example in bringing professional learning to the local level. “I think they will start to see the message because we are actually doing what we’re asking them to do.”

Finally, in Shelby County, Hamner says that while those providing professional learning are beginning to identify meaningful follow-up support, the next step is to make sure there is a way to measure whether that is actually taking place. For example, with 400 math teachers in the district, there is no way someone who provides professional learning in math can observe all of those teachers, she says.

“We know we have some work to do to make sure that it’s feasible and that it really is a way to measure what we did want teachers to be able to do,” she says. She added that in response to some initial feedback, the district has created a fellowship program in which 100 teachers will learn how to lead professional learning in literacy and math and engage in their own learning about effect adult learning strategies.

Another challenge, she added, is getting other district departments that provide professional learning to plan sessions with the principles in mind—even if that means narrowing down the number of options available. The district has had a culture of providing teachers as many learning choices as possible, but Hamner says all that choice might not help the district reach its goals.

“We have to be strategic,” she says, “and say, ‘What aligns to our outcomes and what learning do people need?’”