Menu

Digging deeper

Professional learning can go beyond the basics to reach underserved students

By Sonia Caus Gleason
Categories: Learning designs, Equity, Evaluation & impact
August 2010
I’ve never heard an educator in a high poverty school or district dispute whether his or her school needs to improve. The discussion is always about how and how much. And in all sorts of communities, while some people are satisfied with incremental improvements, others will not rest until every child experiences the nurturing and challenge he or she deserves. When we set our sights high for children, we believe that education facilitates social justice. School communities that are serious about improvement address the learning needs of students and adults. When educators pursue justice, they shape professional development, starting with the needs of the underserved in mind. The basics of professional learning Consistent, excellent teaching is the single greatest factor in improving student achievement over time

Read the remaining content with membership access. Join or log in below to continue.

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem.

Log In
   

Authors

Sonia Caus Gleason

Sonia Caus Gleason (sonia@soniacausgleason.org) is an educational consultant.

References

Hallinger, P. & Heck, R. (1996, February). Reassessing
the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of
empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration
Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44.

Haycock, K. (1998, Summer). Good teaching matters
… a lot. Thinking K-16, 13(2).

Kannapel, P.J., Clements, S.K., Taylor, D., &
Hibpshman, T. (2005, February). Inside the black box of
high-performing high-poverty schools. Lexington, KY: Pritchard
Committee for Academic Excellence.

Leithwood, K., Louis, K.S., Anderson, S., &
Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student
learning. New York: TheWallace Foundation.

Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of
transformation leadership on student engagement with
school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112-129.

National Staff Development Council. (n.d.) NSDC’s
definition of professional development. Available at
www.nsdc.org/standfor/definition.cfm.

Reeves, D. (2004). Accountability in action: A blueprint
for learning organizations. Denver, CO: Advanced Learning
Press.

Sanders,W.L. & Rivers, J.C. (1996, November).
Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student
academic achievement. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee
value-Added Research and Assessment Center.


Image for aesthetic effect only - Sonia-profile-image
+ posts

Categories: Learning designs, Equity, Evaluation & impact

Search
The Learning Professional


Published Date

CURRENT ISSUE



  • Recent Issues

    EVALUATING PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
    February 2024

    How do you know your professional learning is working? This issue digs...

    TAKING THE NEXT STEP
    December 2023

    Professional learning can open up new roles and challenges and help...

    REACHING ALL LEARNERS
    October 2023

    Both special education and general education teachers need support to help...

    THE TIME DILEMMA
    August 2023

    Prioritizing professional learning time is an investment in educators and...

    Skip to content