Learning Forward
Equity and excellence in teaching and learning.
Teachers make between 1,200 and 1,500 spontaneous decisions per day that influence how and whether students learn, including how to introduce new ideas, guide practice, and support student understanding (Jackson, 1968). These decisions often happen in real time, shaped by the teacher’s experience, judgment, and understanding of their students. Underlying these moment-to-moment choices is something less visible: a set of assumptions about how learning works. Consider the following scenario. An 8th-grade mathematics teacher begins a lesson on solving multistep equations. Believing students learn mathematical procedures most effectively by first exploring problems and constructing their own solutions, she presents a problem on the board and asks students to work in pairs to figure out how it might be solved. The room quickly fills with conversation. Some
Read the remaining content with membership access. Join or log in below to continue.
Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem.
References
Baddeley, A.D. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1-29.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.
Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51-57.
Deans for Impact. (2015). The science of learning.
Dekker, S., Lee, N.C., Howard-Jones, P., & Jolles, J. (2012). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 429.
Desimone, L.M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199.
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K.A., Marsh, E.J., Nathan, M.J., & Willingham, D.T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58.
Jackson, P.W. (1968). Life in Classrooms. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R.E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
Macdonald, K., Germine, L., Anderson, A., Christodoulou, J., & McGrath, L.M. (2017). Dispelling the myth: Training in education or neuroscience decreases but does not eliminate beliefs in neuromyths. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1314.
Mayer, R.E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). How people learn II: Learners, contexts, and cultures. National Academies Press.
Renkl, A. (2014). Toward an instructionally oriented theory of example-based learning. Cognitive Science, 38(1), 1-37.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.
Sweller, J. (2017). John Sweller — ACE Conference/researchED Melbourne [Video]. YouTube. learnfwd.org/2f06bb
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.
Sweller, J. & Cooper, G.A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2(1), 59-89.
Nidhi Sachdeva is a researcher, teacher educator, and international speaker specializing in the science of learning and evidence-informed instruction. She teaches at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education at the University of Toronto and works with educators and school systems around the world on improving teaching practice through cognitive science. Her work focuses on teacher expertise, deliberate practice, and translating learning science into practical approaches for classrooms and professional development.
CURRENT ISSUE
Recent Issues
LEARNING WITH AI
February 2026
Generative AI can be a powerful tool for professional learning design and...
WHAT STUDENTS NEED NOW
December 2025
For all students to thrive, we need to understand who they are and what...
LEARNING COMMUNITIES FOR LEADERS
October 2025
Leaders need opportunities to connect, learn, and grow with peers just as...
MAXIMIZING RESOURCES
August 2025
This issue offers advice about making the most of professional learning...
